181 Comments

 User Avatar
 
 User Avatar
jugglersmuggler

Well it saves the carbon print of 1 average human being of said country. So yeah, having 1 less child in Africa doesn't do much, but having 1 less child in Qatar equals 1200 children from Greenland.

83

 User Avatar
glowieguy

I'd consoom her

4

 User Avatar
da_real_queen

28

 User Avatar
analillilol

What's left out of the picture is how much a spoilt brat from the global north emits vs. how much a kid without childhood from the global south emits. With that in mind the gun policies of republicans start to make more sense.

18

 User Avatar
lettore

The idea behind having one fewer child reducing carbon emissions is not their immediate impact, but their future impact due to increasing population. Only issue is it also depletes the human race since we require 2.3 children per household to maintain the existing population.

0

 User Avatar
mechanic444

So quit buying stuff, grow your own food, make your own clothes, and ride a bike, but don't us how to live our lives

-1

 User Avatar
lohengrinori

Her statement is right at one condition : It's that the fate of the poorest places on the planet is to remain poor forever, and that their overage of population is not used to compensate european low birthrate with immigration.

17

 User Avatar
cumontarsdobara

another leftist trick to control people. Earlier they were saying we would run out of fossi fuels. Now it is this Climate change bullshit. We will solve our problems like we always have, by improving our technology. World population would top out at 11 billion anyway.

-4

 User Avatar
johnmcbastard

If you believe CO2 is the problem, you are the problem.

-6

 User Avatar
juhnyboy

You are the carbon footprint they want to reduce...

-1