33 Comments

 User Avatar

 

 User Avatar
monsterc141

Man it took hello games a long time to get NMS to where it is now. Some would argue it's still not up to scratch. Personally I think they've done well, but I just don't see CDPR doing the same. Cheaper and more profitable to bury it and focus on something new probably.

34
 User Avatar
the_fly

all i want is a new bioshock or somthing close to bioshock

7
 User Avatar
hateworldwide

No man's sky still sucks. It's a Pokemon breeding program in space

-13
 User Avatar
memmeboi

Anyone knows where’s the original video of this?

0
 User Avatar
drizzy97

people tend to exaggerate the no man's sky timeline. In the first year of release we got foundations, pathfinder, and atlas rises updates. These were huge improvements to the game. People at this point were already preaching the no man's sky turnaround. In contrast, we are quickly approaching the first release year of cyberpunk with only broken promises to show for it. When you really compare the speed at which nms fixed the game vs cyberpunk, it is pretty clear CD Projekt is not exactly moving at a reasonable pace.

27
 User Avatar
tstonej

10
 User Avatar
kingform

that's why these companies can always get your money 1) release broken unfinished games 2) profit 3) patch after patch 4) wait for some asshole on youtube to hype "the redemption story" 5) profit again

3
 User Avatar
justthinkyoumu

Even if it comes back cdpr will always have the reputation of colossally fucking up and rushing a game that was developed and storyboarded for 10 years having a trailer come out the same year as last of us, BioShock infinite and grand theft auto five (2013)

3
 User Avatar
neeko2t

what happened in the end to NMS is great, but you should never defend a studio that does the same, you pay for a finished product you should not be a beta-tester.

1
 User Avatar
emoji_are_gud

That's a picture to show to your grandkids

1