707 Comments

 User Avatar

 

 User Avatar
shadowedaccount

Agreed, I love my AK more than my m&p 15. We need to normalize AKs over ARs

99
 User Avatar
spacecowboy38

Agreed, throughout written history the only times governments have wanted their population disarmed is for control. Aside from genocides, look at how Australia, New Zealand, Germany and Canada treated their people during covid. They were disarmed and either did what they were told, or got locked up or put in camps. Lives ruined over a shot that doesn't work. Too bad all my guns sank with my boat. Damn shame.

8
 User Avatar
drvond00m

177
 User Avatar
562949832a

Agreed. The main benefit the 5.56mm round has over the 7.62mm is that you can carry more of them. But this is obviously irrelevant in a defensive situation. The further reach of the 7.62 gives defenders (especially ones with the high ground) an invaluable advantage. As we've seen all over the middle east.

1
 User Avatar
konman95

AK-47 has higher recoil. Probably can kill more kids with that so hell yeah!

-8
 User Avatar
vorpswagen03

The Ak is a far superior weapon.

-2
 User Avatar
whohomuhere

Actual AK-47s are so rare, though. All I see nowadays are Norincos or copies (or copies of copies) from former Soviet states.

5
 User Avatar
milbertthefrog

Imagine if the US were as evil and tyrannical as people made it out to be lmao. "Haha, chemical weapons go brrrrrrrrrr"

51
 User Avatar
magnusmagus1

The stock AK is shit. Full auto is unusable unless you need to kill of a horde of zombies standing on a staircase. It's usable in semi-auto, i guess...

1
 User Avatar
theta123

Vietnam= If you do not take ground, you will never win a war Baghdad= Euhm technically the US did actually win this, seeing as how gullible the iraqi's bought US equipment. Somalia/kabul= If the local population complains about radical muslims but refuses to actually fight them, you will lose eventually.

36